Race Review: Hellrunner: Hell in the Middle

hellrunner, hell in the middleAs a three-time loser at Puma’s Hell Up North event, I’ve been all agog for months waiting to find out what the all-new Hell in the Middle event was going to be like. Billed in advance by the organisers as the ‘hilliest, hardest and helliest’ of the three Hellrunner races, it certainly had plenty to live up to.

Well, surprise number one arrived as I entered the Cannock Chase area. I’d been told it was ‘quite nice’ by a few people, but nothing prepared me for what a little slice of heaven it is, particularly as it’s so close to Birmingham, Wolverhampton, and the hideous Rugeley Power Station.

Frankly, I think that the Brummies have staged the biggest cover-up since the Hutton Inquiry, in order to keep this absolute gem of a place all to themselves. It’s mile after mile of fragrant pines interspersed with babbling streams and gorgeous heathland, and I was absolutely captivated by it. But perhaps I should drag myself away from the scenery and get to the race…

Pre-race organisation

After the slightly less than wonderful parking arrangements for Hell Up North, the organisers really got it right here. Tons and tons of well-marshalled, free parking, just a ten-minute stroll from the start. Though maybe next time, some zone markers wouldn’t go amiss: as while parking up was easy, finding one’s anonymous silver Golf after the race in a pine forest now littered with nearly a thousand cars wasn’t quite as simple.

That small quibble aside, there were plenty of Stewards, well-organised baggage drop-off, and plenty of pre-race chat from the guy on the P.A. (though his assertion that “The average Hellrunner is a 27 year-old male – which is as it should be” may not exactly have put him in the running to be Andy Gray’s replacement at Sky).

The race itself

As usual for Hellrunner, there was plenty of pre-race drama, with smoke flares, the appearance of Satan himself, and a smoke-billowing quad bike to get us all away from the mud-strewn starting bowl.

And that was when surprise number two arrived: because after just a few hundred metres, we were sent up one of the nastiest inclines I’ve ever been on (and I’ve done most of the Lakeland Trails series), followed by a succession of steep drops and vicious hills. Nope, they really weren’t joking about the ‘hilliest and helliest’ part.

In fact, by about 4 miles in, very few people were managing to run to the top of every hill, and most people accepted that this was going to be a pretty tough day out.

Bog of Doom Number One soon arrived, which was littered with the usual hidden boulders and tree-stumps, causing many people to get out the side and run around, which the single young marshall didn’t have a whole lot of luck stopping.

After that, apart from the many hellish hills, there were some absolutely superb stretches through the dense pine forests, including a long run along a babbling stream that was sheer delight for my old, tired feet.

The final Bog of Doom finally delivered the waist-deep mud we’d all been expecting, and the last few hundred metres took in a superbly-designed series of scrambles up sandy banks before the blessed relief of the finish, after 11 truly hellish miles.

Overall verdict

Paul Magner and his team should be feeling pretty pleased with themselves this morning. The organisation was spot-on, the course was absolutely hellish, and even the t-shirt was better than usual.

Does it live up to the ‘hilliest, hardest and helliest’ billing? Absolutely. Though it fell short of the neck-deep mud we’ve come to expect from Hell Up North.

If you’re fit enough to deal with hill after hill, then the atmosphere and scenery make this one of the best races you’ll ever find. Though, if I’m honest, being 20 years older than the ‘average Hellrunner’ I may have to stick with just Hell Up North after this…

Posted in Races | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gear review: Nike+ GPS app

Nike+ app home screenFrankly, any runner who doesn’t use some form of GPS tracking is just kidding themselves about the distance they’re covering.

I should know: after many years of running 6 miles most nights, my first encounter with a Garmin GPS for runners showed me that I’d actually been running 5.6 miles, and was therefore neither as fit nor as fast as I’d previously thought.

And so, I adopted first a Garmin, then RunKeeper for the iPhone, which has the added advantage of giving you in-ear updates about pace, time and distance.

The only problem with RunKeeper though, as most long-term users will tell you, is that with every new update comes a new glitch; resulting in either the loss of all your valued data, or the lady who speaks in your ear … talking … very … very … slowly. Or even not at all.

Then, a few months ago, along came Nike with an update on their charming but hopelessly innacurate Nike+ pedometer unit.

Naturally, as no friend of faceless big business and corporate American ethics, I decided to stick with the little guy, and give RunKeeper another chance. Just before it dumped all my data again…

So, what choice did I have but to give the Nike+ GPS App a whirl? And wow, am I glad I did.

OK, so the website it comes with is pretty hopeless, concentrating on flash graphics rather than hard analytical data. But the actual App works perfectly, and even allows you to get audio updates every half mile if you so wish.

The interface is simple and clear: and most importantly, appears absolutely reliable, having performed perfectly every time I’ve used it.

Frankly, there are only two things I’d change about the Nike+ App:

1. The inane Americanisms offered by the post-run voiceover: “Hey, you can just run all week baby” being amongst the worst.

2. Unlike RunKeeper, Nike+ doesn’t offer you a 15 second countdown to the start of your run, meaning that once you’ve pressed ‘Start’, you either have to try and shove it into your armband on the go, or add a few seconds to your overall time.

But those small and, let’s face it, fairly petty quibbles aside, this seems to be the App that runners have been waiting for.

Posted in Running Gear | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Gear Review: Garmin Forerunner 110 GPS

As a long time fan of the Garmin 405CX I reviewed here, I was fascinated to see that Garmin had launched an entry level GPS running watch in the Forerunner 110.

Coming in at around the £160 mark online, compared to £250 for the 405CX, it’s considerably more affordable than its big brother. But the question is, how many of the 405CX’s fantastic features have Garmin dispensed with in order to shave so much off the price?

And the answer, unsurprisingly, is most of them. But having lived with the 110 for a few weeks now, I’m beginning to think that that’s no bad thing. So rather than focusing on what’s been taken away, it’s probably more worthwhile discussing what the Forerunner 110 does well.

Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity

Advanced runners who want to analyse every nuance of their performance might as well look away now, because this thing really isn’t for you. It’s clearly aimed at the new and only moderately serious runner, and does a very good job of providing just the information you need and nothing that you don’t.

Answering the setup questions took me all of two minutes, after which I put on the not especially comfortable chest strap that contains the heart rate monitor and waited a further minute or so for the GPS to establish my position.

Once that was done, it took just the push of a button to start everything off, and then a further push of the red page/menu button to flip between the three main screens , which are time and pace, heartbeat and actual time. Though in fairness, I don’t generally need to know the time of day when I’m running, so it’s a pity that this last screen isn’t disabled when you’re in running mode.

The most useful of the three screens (left)  displays distance, elapsed time and current pace from top to bottom, though it’s worth noting these facts from the user guide before you set out, as the red wording at the top and bottom of the bezel that tell you what the numbers indicate is totally unreadable.

The heart rate screen, however, uses all the available space to display your current heartrate, making it ideal for those of us who like to train in different zones from time to time.

Tracking your runs

Like every Garmin GPS, the Forerunner 110 uses a clever, clip-on charger which allows it to stay waterproof to IPX7 standards (shallow water for up to 30 minutes). In the case of the 110 also enables it to hook up to a Mac or PC with a USB slot, which then takes you to your own page on the Garmin website, where you can view a map and stats for your run, including heart rate, distance, average pace, pace per mile and elevation.

Crucially, this is all better laid out and more thought through than anything I’ve seen fromPolar, RunKeeper, or many of the other proprietary GPS websites on the market.

The predictable summing up

Despite the fact that I love the ‘virtual partner’ feature of the Garmin 405CX, not to mention its incredibly cool ‘strokable bezel’ control, I totally get the point of the Forerunner 110.

It’s a no-frills way to track your pace, route and heartrate, and then analyse them on the Garmin site. The controls and set-up are idiot-proof and it even sets the time of day automatically using the satellite signal.

So if you’re just a casual runner, or simply don’t have £250 to blow on its big brother, the Forerunner 110 is a great training tool, and entirely worthy of its 5 Jelly Baby Rating.

Posted in Running Gear | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Shoe Review: Salomon Exit Aeros

Salomon Exit AerosWith Hellrunner looming over the horizon , my thoughts once again turned to footwear that could withstand the somewhat unique challenges of this rocky/muddy/steep/sandy/wet 11 mile course.

Last time out, I wore my best North Face Gore-Tex Hedgehogs, which, frankly was a mistake; as the last thing you want to wear when wading through a chest-high peat bog is Gore-Tex. I might as well have filled a couple of plastic bags with sludge, stepped in and gaffa-taped them around my ankles…

So imagine my delight when a pair of Salomon Exit Aero rocked up at Jelly Baby Towers this week, just in time for me to start my bad weather training sessions.

Billed by Salomon footwear as ‘multi-sport shoes’, I have to say that they look more like lightweight hikers than bona fide trail running shoes. Or to put it another way, they’re a little more Mars Bar than Aero. However, with so much mud and gravel on my mind, the least I could do was strap them on and take them out for a slow but sludgy 11 miles through the dunes and along the beach.

First Impressions on the Feet

Salomon Exit SoleThese are pretty sturdy shoes, without quite as much in the way of flexibility as I’d like. But on the upside, the ‘Contagrip’ soles are soft and massively grippy, and there’s a fair bit of cushioning all around the uppers and in the heel area too. Not to mention plenty of breathability.

They’re missing gaiters on the tongues, which I usually insist on for trail shoes, but in all fairness, with Hellrunner in mind, I’m looking for shoes that can let mud out more than keep it out. So that’s alright then.

While these things are also fairly wide, the laces allow for plenty of adjustment, meaning that I was pretty comfortable by the time I took a last bite of my Marathon (calling them Snickers is a modern fad I refuse to have any truck with) and set out for 11 miles of road, gravel, sand and sludge.

Hitting the road

While these things are pretty comfortable for walking in, they really don’t offer the kind of cushioning you need to run in them on Caramac, sorry, tarmac. So by the time I’d done a couple of miles of pavement  on the way to the dunes, my knees were really feeling it and my hamstrings were tightening up.

It was with some relief then that I finally hit the trail proper, which mixes soft sand with Crunchie gravel for the next 3 miles or so. And I have to say, these things make great trail shoes for this kind of mixed terrain, as they offer a good balance of grip, protection and underfoot support that was a real Bounty at this stage.

The sole pattern also delivered fabulous grip, which almost made up for the slight lack of flexibility and gave me quite a Boost.

Yet the Salomons also impressed when I got to the beach and the blessed relief of the turnaround. Running on sand, the lack of underfoot cushioning really didn’t matter and they were supremely comfortable over every surface, coping well with the serious sludge too.

The Self-important Summing Up Bit

I’m a big fan of Salomon trainers, with my only complaint being that they don’t always last as long as I’d like them to. However, the Exit Aeros boast a very sturdy construction that leads me to believe I’ll be wearing these things for some time.

What I won’t be doing is wearing them over a paved area again. Ever. As there really isn’t anything underfoot to absorb the pounding that you need when you’re built like a Double Decker.

Having said that, I’ve been looking for a shoe that will be able to live with the unique demands of the Hellrunner series, and I think that in the Salomon Exit Aeros, I may have found them. So despite the fact that my hamstrings are still complaining about the lack of underfoot cushioning, I have to say that these 4 jelly baby ratingare solid well-built shoes that make great hikers and decent heavy duty trail shoes for when you know there is only going to be gravel or soft stuff underfoot.

So while I don’t exactly love these things, they’re fit for purpose, so I’d have to be a real Flake not to give them a respectable Four Jelly Baby rating.

Posted in Running Gear | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Do Oxfam do XXL running vests?

Having made yet another less than impressive recovery from injury, I’m now back up to speed and ready to start looking for more races (well, 7 miles an hour is ‘a speed’ of sorts).

So what better way to add some motivation to my currently pathetic training programme than to sign up for a charity?

I was all set to run London in 2011, as having been rejected by the Ballot 5 years running, I’d have been guaranteed an entry. If only the ballot hadn’t closed after about 4 hours, precluding me from even managing to get that right…

And so, on the very day that I decided to go for a Golden Bond place with someone or other, I got a very nice email from someone called Hannah at Oxfam, asking if I’d give them a mention on TJBFS.com

Well, as they’re the official charity for next year’s VLM – and a very worthy cause to boot – how could I possibly refuse.

And so, if, like me, you’re considering putting yourself up for fundraising duties as well as many junk miles, injuries and plates of carbs served al dente, might I draw your attention to the fact that those nice people at Oxfam currently have places for the Royal Parks Half Marathon, which looks absolutely stunning; Run to the Beat in London in September; and they’re also offering the chance to go to that Geordie-laden uphill struggle and run in the Great North Run for Oxfam.

Anyway, good deed done for the day, I’m off to get ahead of myself for tomorrow’s good deed by applying for one of Oxfam’s Golden Bond places in next year’s London Marathon.

Wish me luck. And if you want to sponsor me, watch this space

Posted in Running Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Runner’s Nutrition: Lucozade Sport Jelly Beans

The nerve of these people! What on earth were they thinking? After all, yours truly has long been… wossname… synonymous with heavy consumption of Bertie Bassett’s finest confection; before, during and after races. Goodness, have they even read the title of this blog?

Apparently not, as just last week a few bags of new Lucozade Sport Jelly BEANS dropped onto the mat here at Jelly Baby Towers.

And while I’m always glad to try new things, this just seemed to be against the natural order of things. But I’m a fair-minded sort, and so, for a couple or three days, I eschewed Jelly Babies, bananas and Cranberry Taut in favour of Lucozade’s latest foray into range extension.

So do these things work?

Well, first off, I have to declare that I’m not a fan of Lucozade drinks, as I prefer the unsweetened alternative provided by Taut.

However, these things seem to be sugar and syrup-based, and pack an even heftier carb punch per 100g than jelly babies. So I followed the instructions and munched a bag, followed by a glass of water. They mix orange and raspberry flavour beans in every bag, and frankly, they taste very nice; though they might be a bit sickly without the H2O chaser.

I then set out for a slightly warm 10 miler, taking another bag and a small bottle of water with me. As is my wont, I waited for a few miles, then started munching and sipping as I went. I was very pleasantly surprised too, as not only were they easy on the stomach, I felt full of energy throughout and put in a fairly respectable performance.

However, at the end of the day, there’s no miracle ingredient that makes these things more than just a pretty pleasant way to get some carbohydrate energy into your system while you train.

They do seem to pack more carbs than standard jelly beans per gram, but then, you could always just eat more standard jelly beans. After all, at 99p for a 30g pack, these aren’t cheap.

Which is better, babies or beans?

The small problem these presented when running, was getting these slippery little suckers into my mouth. More than one of them bit the dust of the dunes as I ran.

Though through trial and error, I’ve worked out that the best way to take them is to tear a very small corner off the pack and try to ‘drink’ the beans from the small opening this creates.

Which is where Jelly Babies score a good bit higher, being considerably easier to get a grip of when you’re on the hoof.

Also, and this is crucial, as I am prone to accepting proffered sweets from strangers in the latter stages of marathons and half-marathons, I also like the tamper-proof nature of Jelly Babies.

You see, that light dusting of sugar would surely give the game away if someone had licked their Jelly Babies before handing them out to runners, whereas the shiny, Shellac finish of Jelly Beans offers no such comfort.

The entirely objective and fair-minded findings

While I was initially a bit sceptical, I actually like the Lucozade Jelly Beans quite a lot. They plainly deliver the goods in terms of energy and are gentle on your stomach too.

Though having said that, I’m still going to be paranoidly looking out for purveyors of free Jelly Babies the next time I run a marathon…

Posted in Running Gear, Running knowledge, Training | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Gear Review: Polaroid Vector Running Sunglasses

There is a character in Douglas Adams’ wonderful book ‘So Long and Thanks for All the Fish’ who, unbeknownst to him, is a Rain God. Wherever he goes, the clouds follow him, and water him.

Which makes him pretty much the opposite of my good self.

Yep, all it takes is for me to idly wonder where my shorts are and all precipitation will magically cease in order for the sun to put his hat on to make me as hot and sweaty as possible.

So, as an inveterate plodder with a faulty thermostat, lightweight sunglasses that will stay in place regardless of the rivers of sweat pouring down my face are something of an essential buy.

For the last year or so, such duties have fallen to the darkly handsome Polaroid Medal sunglasses reviewed here. However, having enjoyed their lightweight comfort for a full 12 months now, I couldn’t resist trying out the new, improved and even sexier 2010 incarnation, the Polaroid Vector 99 P7007A.

First impressions? They’re sex on legs…

While they’re far from cheap, you always get a bang for your buck when you buy Polaroid sunglasses.

Open up that slinky case and your first thought is ‘Cool, they’ve wedged three pairs of sunglasses in there by mistake!’

But no, as you’ll quickly find out, they’ve stuck three pairs of running sunglasses in there completely on purpose. Okay, so there’s only one set of lightweight legs, but they come with one-piece brown tints fitted, and alternative sets of orange tint and clear lenses slotted into protective foam in the case.

What’s really clever about the Vectors though, is how quick and easy it is to switch between the three sets of lenses. Simply bend one side of the top frame up slightly, and the silver section that holds the lenses slides out, before your replacement lens clicks into place.

The result is a very robust arrangement, which really belies the waif-like weight and proportions of the Vectors. Polaroid don’t give an official weight, but they appear to be about 25g, which is next to nothing in the grand scheme of things.

These are also strikingly good-looking sunglasses to my mind, if a little bit on the ‘bling’ side. In fact, to be honest, my Good Lady Wife has started to refer to me as ‘Puff Daddy’ in front of the kids when I’m wearing them. Though that’s actually an improvement on the Ray Charles jibes I’ve endured while wearing the Polaroid Medals over the last 12 months.

But does even P Diddy need three different lenses? Well, yes. As the weather has been mildly atrocious since these things rocked up here at Jelly Baby Towers, I’ve run through golf ball-sized hailstones, where the clear lenses were simply a godsend; the deep gloaming of a late afternoon run at the beach where a slight miscalculation with regard to sundown made my choice of the orange tints an inspired one; and now that the weather has picked up a bit, I’ve enjoyed a sunny, sweaty traipse through the dunes where the brown tints showed that Polaroid really know their stuff when it comes to clarity of vision.

Second impression, they’re pretty clever too…

Well, when it comes to running sunglasses, lightness, comfort and fog-resistance are even more important than clarity of vision.

So while the Polaroid vectors undoubtedly keep UV at bay, that would be to little avail if they didn’t perform when the heat is on.

Fortunately, someone at Polaroid has obviously rethought the whole concept of sunglasses for runners, and incorporated a couple of superb design details.

The first of these is the adjustable rubber fitments you’ll find on the leg. The soft little things can be slid up and down the leg to allow perfect adjustment behind your ears, ensuring that the Vectors stay firmly in place while you’re running, without rubbing or chafing at all.

The second great design detail is that the lenses ‘float’ beneath the frames, pulling off the difficult trick of giving you all round protection from the sun, while ensuring plenty of airflow to prevent the lenses misting up.

The sweaty but slightly smug conclusion…

I must admit that while I acquired the Polaroid Vectors for athletic purposes, they now live in my car, because the orange tints make the most superb driving glasses I’ve ever had. When the sky turns black and the rains come down, putting these on is like making the sun come out. They’re also great for evening runs.

But it’s when the clouds part and it’s time to take my ageing, sweaty body out in the sunshine for a run that these things really come into their own. The vision through the brown tints is perfect, they’re so light and comfortable that you forget you’re wearing them, and best of all, with all that ventilation and a hydrophobic coating, it’s impossible to steam them up.

Even as I type this post, sweatier than a Lee Evans encore, after my first hot weather ten-miler of the season, I can see the screen of my Mac as clear as day through the Vectors.

And so, having given the previous incarnation of Polaroid’s sunglasses for runners a rare 5 Jelly Baby Rating, I’m afraid that the Vectors are such a massive improvement, I’m going to have to give them the whole damn bag.

Technical Specification

• Polaroid polarized lenses
• 100% UV400 protection
• Filter category 3
• Weight 25g (Unofficial)
• Specially designed ear fittings for better hold
• Unique construction with lenses secured at the nose
• Clear, brown and orange easily interchangeable lenses
• Clear and orange lenses are non-polarized
• Comes with padded, zipped Polaroid case
• Inside frame width 130mm, lens height 39mm
Posted in Running Gear | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments