Comments on: Asics Gel Cumulus 9 v Gel Cumulus 10. The big semi-scientific shootout. http://tjbfs.com/2009/01/30/asics-gel-cumulus-9-v-gel-cumulus-10-the-big-semi-scientific-shootout/ Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:57:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Finally, after 250 miles, the Asics Gel Cumulus 10 Review… | Taking Jelly Babies From Strangers http://tjbfs.com/2009/01/30/asics-gel-cumulus-9-v-gel-cumulus-10-the-big-semi-scientific-shootout/#comment-573 Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:39:50 +0000 http://tjbfs.com/?p=512#comment-573 [...] I first got my new Cumulus 10s, I really thought that the changes from version 9 were merely cosmetic. After all, while they felt firmer and more supportive, that’s pretty [...]

]]> By: ultra guy http://tjbfs.com/2009/01/30/asics-gel-cumulus-9-v-gel-cumulus-10-the-big-semi-scientific-shootout/#comment-503 Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:55:22 +0000 http://tjbfs.com/?p=512#comment-503 So true. I have had five pairs of the 9′s and love them! I can’t even run in the 10s’ or 11′s: they jacked the heel up and the midsole is way too stiff. I have had to look elsewhere as I’ve been with the Cumulus since the 6′s, and before that, since the early 1980′s with the GT-II, the Excaliber GT, and the Epirus, just to name a few of my favorites.

I’m trying the Landreths now, and find that the midsole of the 6′s is too squooshy, so I’m trying to find a pair of 5′s as these are a little more firm according to many raters.

I hate to think my best option is the Pegasus 27, but that’s all I can find out there right now. In my opinion, Tiger cannot even say that it makes a neutral shoe for long-distance (marathon or over) runners at this point in time, and I’ve worn Tigers almost exclusively for 35 years. Very disappointed.

]]>