The Nike+ is not a star on ice.

nikepouchHaving praised the Nike+ iPod gadget to the skies a couple of days ago, for its accuracy, its user-friendliness and, heck, just for its all round wonderfulness, I today discovered that it is not a star on ice.

You see, the North of England, where I currently reside, is in the grip of a terrifying cold spell sent by arctic demons with a view to destroying our economy and disrupting our whole way of life. Which, in terms of the British weather, means that the temperature is down as low as -9 degrees at night, causing something of a frost in the morning. A frost that is now lasting most of the day, in places where the sun doesn’t shine, if you’ll pardon the expression.

Now, I know all about the ice storms in North America, blizzards in Siberia and Avalanches in the alps. But look, those guys expect extreme weather and are fairly well-prepared for it. In the UK, our entire transport infrastructure can be brought to a shuddering halt by 2 inches of snow…

So anyway, if you’re British, we’re at the dawn of a new Ice Age. And if you’re reading this from outside the UK, it’s a little bit icy out there. Which brings me to the big cold-weather failing of the otherwise fairly splendid Nike+ unit.

You see, the Nike+ calibrates itself by asking you to run exactly 400m and then telling it when you’re done. In this way, it measures your average stride length. And so, particularly if you’ve performed this calibration after running a couple of miles, and are therefore taking your normal strides, ratherĀ  than the long strides of a fresh runner or the tiny strides of someone at the end of a marathon, then the unit is going to be pretty accurate in normal use.

But then, when you go out for a run on icy streets, you will inevitably take smaller strides in an attempt not to fall over, and your six mile run will suddenly become 6.7 miles, according to the Nike+ unit, thus messing up all of the figures on your otherwise accurate Nike+ web page.

Obviously, running on ice is a reasonably rare occurrence. Even so, it possibly suggests that Nike could profitably give some thought to allowing users to rectify inaccurate mileages on the website; which would make the whole Nike+ concept even better than it already is, and by some distance.

About these ads

One thought on “The Nike+ is not a star on ice.

  1. I’m with you on the inflated mileage readings on snow and ice. I went for a run yesterday and had increased my route ( to what extent, I wasn’t sure at the time). There was about 2 inches of snow, and it seemed that every 100 feet or so there were random patches of ice underneath. Needless to say I was taking it easy and my strides were quite short. At any rate, I was extremely pleased with myself when my Nike+ chip congratulated me on a 8.41 mile run, my longest yet! I was, however, a bit incredulous so I mapped the run on two different websites, which both posted a mileage of around 6.7 miles. I am glad that someone else on the globe has seemed to share this experience. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s